Laman

Senin, 26 September 2011

Kiron 105/2,8 MACRO & Leica Elmar 100/4 macro on NEX

This is not scientific test, that's kind of boring test for me :D so it's not represent all copies of both lenses.
My friend allow me to test his Leica elmar 100/4 macro non bellow version against my Kiron 105/2,8
Leica said to be 1:1,75 maginification, while Kiron 1:1
on body it's written 0,6 mmeter MFD, but it can be turned to closer ( about 0,5 in Kiron) 
Kiron has 0,45 MFD

Over all Leica has better control of light & lower contrast while Kiron high contrast & little bit sharper

elmar

kiron
 I forgot which one is elmar/kiron in 2 photos below, can you distinguish them?





elmar

kiron

elmar

kiron

I shot some of this dragon fly, but it cannot be good for comparison 'coz it was in different place also  different setting, but I think Kiron is sharper
kiron
elmar
that's the closest can go for elmar, here's closest of Kiron

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar

Entri yang Diunggulkan

backyard Reptile

Topcon 135/3,5 RE Minolta Rokkor 500/8 Topcon 135/3,5 RE ROW Visionar 154/1,9