Steinheil Munchen Tele Quinar D 135/2,8

Carl Zeiss Super Dynarex 135/4. Icarex BM

This is the Super Dynarex 135/4. I read that this lens was made by Voigtlander  and it famous as a decent lens. I had DKL mount with Voigtlander brand version, nice color and sharp HERE

I dont have adapter for it, so I put male to male 52-58 ring on it and glued it for temporary use. and attach it in Helicoid adapter

All shot at wide open.

Steinheil Munchen Auto D Tele Quinar 135/2,8 M42

Steinheil Munchen Auto D Tele Quinar 135/2,8

Steinheil Munchen Tele Quinar 135/3,5 M39

This lens is for SLR M39, not M39 aka LTM rangefinder. But it has short register as SLR one. I guess it's for Braun paxette M39 SLR. It's tiny and has MFD 3 meters, too long for common SLR, remind me of Voigtlander super dynarex which has 4 meters MFD.
In My Sony NEX I use extension tube + LTM-NEX adapter to reach infinity. I really like it's compact size and beautiful silver/chrome finish. Everyone will watching it :D
There's one thing that I like about results with this lens, I can see 3D in most of results than other lens, specially 135mm lens.
 shots at wide open aperture except last one

ISO 400 or 800

Topcon Auto RE 135/3,5

Tokyo Kogaku Japan made great lenses. price of their lenses increase everyday.
I read US Navy use Topcon for their activities in past.
Now I got this lens. and understand why people say it's great factory.

wideopen

f8

Isco Gottingen Isconar 135/4 Exakta mount

Got mine from very good friend Lars from Norway. It's the all metal and light version.

wide open Soft at close distance but sharp at around 4 or 5 meters to infinity.

wide open, distance approx. 10 m

wide open distance approx. 2-3 meters

Infinity at F 8 or F11

closest distance, f5,6

Tair 11A 135/2,8 & CZ Sonnar 135/2,8 T* AEJ

I have the Zeiss for long enough, and I always satisfied with it. Now I have Tair 11A, which is said to be one of best 135mm lens ever made.
Phisically, Tair is heavier and little bit longer. all metal stuff, while Sonnar has rubber grib for focusing ring.
All have internal hood, but Tair is shorter, not long enough.
Blades? Tair has 20  blades, sonnar has 8.
Closest distance, Tair 1,2m Zeiss 1,6m
Both has CA and sharp start at wideopen.
This is not scientific test, just few minutes comparison in my backyard.
Camera Sony NEX5, white balance sunny, landscape mode.
There were other images, but speed was various so the tone cannot represent the real comparison. this happened because light was changed often.
No edit except resize & auto sharpen (in irfanview)
In the first comparison we can see Tair has more green color. while Zeiss has more pastel color
Click images for bigger one.

Fresh B/W from Sony NEX5 at 1,2m (closest distance of Zeiss)

This one was at F 5,6

My conclusion?
I like 'em both. 

Tair 11A 135/2,8 M42

There are many good 135mm lenses, some say that amongst the best of 135 this Tair is in the list.
20 blades, smooth bokeh, nice rendering. etc.
Closest focus distance is marked 1,2m

wideopen

cropped

CZ Sonnar 135/2,8 HFT Rollei

I have Contax/Yashica mount of this lens with T* coating.
This lens is my friend's gem. I compared both lenses. Results; no big difference.
this lens is lighter than T* one. and bit more difficult to get focus, if I turned focusing ring just a little, it will missfocus, specially at wide open shot.

wideopen

Chromatic abberration or purple fring easily appear in this picture, I think I will get same result with T* lens.

wideopen

Stepdown, it is easy to get sharp image

Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3,5 MC on NEX5